AJAY NAGAR,GHAZIABAD vs. ITO WARD - 1(5), GHAZIABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal noted the assessee's withdrawal application due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The appeal was dismissed with liberty to restore it if the dispute is not settled under the scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order for assessment year 2009-10. The assessee later filed an application to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's withdrawal of the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘SMC-1’ : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA & SHRI KULDIP SINGH
PER KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER : Appellant, Shri Uday Singh (hereinafter referred to as ‘the assessee’), by filing the present appeal, sought to set aside the impugned order dated 14.03.2019 passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Ghaziabad qua the assessment year 2009-10.
None present on behalf of the assessee. However, an application has been filed by the assessee seeking withdrawal of the appeal on the ground that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020” and has filed necessary Forms 1 & 2 with the Tax Department, which was accepted and processed vide Form 3 issued by the Tax Department.
Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, present appeal is hereby dismissed with liberty to get it restored by the assessee in case dispute is not settled as per scheme. The Revenue has no objection with regard to the aforesaid caveat. Consequently, the present appeal is dismissed. Order pronounced in open court on this 4th day of March, 2021 after the conclusion of the virtual hearing.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026