DY CIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-1(2)(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S. BLUEBAY MAURITUS INVESTMENT LTD., MUMBAI

ITA 1370/MUM/2021Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 April 2022AY 2014-159 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that brought-forward capital losses cannot be adjusted against capital gains that are exempt from tax under a Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The treaty benefit should be considered first, and only remaining losses can be carried forward.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a Mauritius-based FII, claimed exemption for short-term capital gains under the India-Mauritius treaty. The Assessing Officer (AO) sought to reduce the brought-forward capital losses by the amount of these exempt gains, arguing for set-off first. The assessee contended that treaty benefits should be applied before setting off losses.

What were the issues?

Whether brought-forward capital losses can be set off against capital gains exempt under a tax treaty, and the order of applying treaty benefits versus set-off of losses.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 90(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘I‘ BENCH

Before: SHRI M.BALAGANESH & SHRI KULDIP SINGH&

For Appellant: Shri Anish Thacker / Shri Hemen
For Respondent: Shri Rajneesh Yadav, Shri Anish Thacker / Shri Hemen
Hearing: 25/04/2022Pronounced: 29/04/2022

PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M):

These appeals in ITA Nos.1370/Mum/2021 & 1369/Mum/2021 for A.Yrs.2014-15 & 2013-14 respectively arise out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-55, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)- 55, Mumbai/10164/2018-19 & CIT(A)-55, Mumbai/10228/2016-17 dated 09/02/2021 & 08/02/2021 respectively (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the M/s. Bluebay Mauritius Investment Ltd.,

order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s.144C(3) & 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 21/12/2017 & 23/02/2017 by the ld. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 90(2)

All 387 judgments and leading authorities on Section 90(2) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →