LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 2(2), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's ground regarding commission paid, following prior rulings. It allowed the assessee's additional ground concerning export profits eligible for reduction under Section 115JB. Revenue's grounds on club membership and work-in-progress valuation were dismissed.
What were the facts?
The appeals concerned disallowance of commission paid, treatment of non-compete fees, club membership expenditure, and valuation of work-in-progress. The Tribunal relied on previous co-ordinate bench decisions for most issues.
What were the issues?
Whether commission paid was allowable and how non-compete fees should be treated. The applicability of Section 115JB in relation to export profits was also a key issue.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(27)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Reliance Utilities & Power Ltd.2,118 citing313 ITR 340 · 2009 · HC
- Sumati Dayal v. CIT1,967 citing214 ITR 801 · 1995 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Durga Prasad More1,579 citing82 ITR 540 · 1971 · SC
- CIT v. HDFC Bank Ltd.1,261 citing366 ITR 505 · 2014 · HC
- HDFC Bank Ltd. v. DCIT408 citing67 Taxmann.com 42 · 2016 · HC
- CIT v. Reliance Industries Ltd.218 citing102 Taxmann.com 372 · 2011 · HC
- CIT v. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.164 citing93 Taxmann.com 32 · 2018 · SC
- CIT v. Asahi India Safety Glass Ltd.129 citing346 ITR 329 · 2012 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Godawari Power & Ispat Ltd.104 citing42 Taxmann.com 551 · 2014 · HC
- CIT v. Durgaprasad More 82 1TR 540 (SC) and Juggilal Kamlapat Vs CIT95 citing73 ITR 702 · 1969 · SC
- Ajanta Pharma Ltd. v. CIT85 citing327 ITR 305 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
- Sunil Siddharthbhai v. CIT82 citing156 ITR 509 · 1985 · SC
- CIT v. Amway India Enterprises71 citing346 ITR 341 · 2012 · HC · Read judgment
- Guffic Chem (P.) Ltd. v. CIT66 citing332 ITR 602 · 2011 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Best & Co. (P.) Ltd.64 citing60 ITR 11 · 1966 · SC
- Kettlewell Bullen & Co. Ltd. v. CIT57 citing53 ITR 261 · 1964 · SC · Read judgment
- M/s Tamilnadu Petro Products Ltd. v. ACIT56 citing13 Taxmann.com 139 · 2011 · HC
- Sharp Business System v. CIT III53 citing27 Taxmann.com 50 · 2012 · HC · Read judgment
- Oberoi Hotel Private Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax42 citing236 ITR 903 · 1999 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Rai Bahadur Jairam Valji41 citing35 ITR 148 · 1959 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Sulzer India Ltd.38 citing369 ITR 717 · 2014 · HC
- CIT v. Bhari Information Technology Systems (P.) Ltd.32 citing340 ITR 593 · 2012 · SC
- Gillanders Arbuthnot & Co. Ltd. v. CIT29 citing53 ITR 283 · 1964 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Balkrishna Industries Ltd.21 citing88 Taxmann.com 273 · 2017 · SC
- Blue Star Ltd. v. DCIT12 citing13 SOT 25 · 2007 · ITAT
- Ltd (2006) 8 SOT 6 (Mum)(URO) 2. Blue Star Ltd (2007) 13 SOT 25 (Mum)(URO) 3. Blue Star Ltd. v. CIT5 citing79 Taxmann 281 · 1995 · HC
- 16. In Commissioner of Income Tax v. Saraswathi Publicities3 citing132 ITR 207 · 1981 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “A”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH
Heard together (4 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
2 Larsen & Toubro Asstt.Yrs 2001-02 & 2001-02
Per: S.Rifaur Rahman (AM): These cross appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue arise out of the independent orders of the Learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) for the assessment years 2001-02 and 2002-03. 2. Various grounds are raised in the cross appeals; they are deal
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 115JB
- Azure Knowledge Corporation Private… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2013/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Braithwaite & Co. Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 1(1), KolkataITA 1076/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026