VANDANA RASTOGI,HASANPUR UP vs. ITO -1(4), AMROHA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's request for withdrawal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed, with a caveat allowing reinstitution if the dispute is not resolved under the scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for AY 2015-16. The assessee subsequently requested withdrawal of the appeal, stating they had opted to settle the dispute under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020'. No one appeared on behalf of the assessee during the hearing.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to opting for a tax settlement scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “A” BENCH: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI K.N.CHARY
directed against the order of learned CIT(A), Moradabad dated 14.05.2019.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of Virtual hearing before us. The assessee, vide its letter dated 24.02.2021, received through email, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by her and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the ”Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”.
Considering the aforesaid situation, the captioned appeal is consigned to records and treated as dismissed.
However, the aforesaid is subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the aforestated Act, the appellant (i.e., the assessee) shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application appropriately as per law.
The respondent (i.e., the Revenue) has no objection with regard to the aforesaid caveat.
In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is consigned to record and, for statistical purposes, is treated as dismissed.
Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 12th March, 2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- Vandemataram Projects Private Limited vs. Raipur Development AuthorityChhattisgarh · 27 Oct 2026