CENTRE FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIAL CHANGE,MUMBAI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the AO had applied its mind to the issue of rent from AIILSG, considering the long-standing practice and the conditional grant of land. The revision was deemed erroneous as the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, allotted space in its building to another charitable trust (AIILSG) at a nominal rent. The CIT(E) initiated revision proceedings under Section 263, alleging the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to examine the adequacy of rent charged and a donation received from AIILSG.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) was justified in invoking Section 263 powers when the AO had considered the issue of rent from a related charitable entity and the assessment order was not erroneous.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “C”, MUMBAI
PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JM:
These two appeals have been filed by the assessee against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Mumbai [in short 'the CIT(E)’] passed u/s.263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ( in short ‘the Act’) for the 2 assessment years 2015-16 and 2016-17, respectively. Both impugned
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026