INNOVA PREMISES CO.OP.SOC. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO WD-22 (1) (7), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1699/MUM/2021Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 May 2022AY 2017-183 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest earned from a Cooperative Bank is allowable. The Tribunal followed the precedents set by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Citizen Cooperative Society Ltd. and The Mavilayi Service Cooperative Bank Ltd.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Innova Premises Co-op. Society Limited, claimed a deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest earned from a Cooperative Bank. The Assessing Officer disallowed this deduction.

What were the issues?

Whether interest earned from a Cooperative Bank is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80P(2)(d)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” Bench, Mumbai

For Appellant: Ms. Rucha Vaidya
For Respondent: Shri Pravin Salunkhe
Hearing: 30.03.2022Pronounced: 02.05.2022

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned CIT(A) dated 31.7.2021 pertains to A.Y. 2017-18.

2.

The solitary issue arising in the appeal is disallowance of deduction claimed under section 80P(2)(d) of the I.T. Act of Rs. 14,03,311/- being interest earned from Cooperative Bank.

3.

Upon hearing both the parties and perusing the records, I find that the issue is covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Citizen Cooperative Society Ltd. (Civil Appeal No. 10245 of 2017 vide order dated 8.8.2017). Moreover similar issue was elaborately dealt by a larger bench of Honourable Supreme Court in the case of The Mavilayi Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. & Ors. Vs. CIT, Calicut & Ors. (Civil Appeal Nos. 7343-7350 of 2019 dated 12.1.2021) and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee. We may gainfully refer to the Hon'ble Apex Court

2 Innova Premises Co-op. Society Limited observation in para 21 as under, wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court referred to its earlier decision of Citizen Cooperative Society Ltd. (supra) :-

“The following propositions may be culled out from the judgment:

(I) That section 80P of the IT Act is a benevolent provision, which was enacted by Parliament in order to encourage and promote the growth of the co-operative sector generally in the economic life of the country and must, therefore, be read liberally and in favour of the assessee; (II) That once the assessee is entitled to avail of deduction, the entire amount of profits and gains of business that are attributable to any one or more activities mentioned in subsection (2) of section 80P must be given by way of deduction; (III) That this Court in Kerala State Cooperative Marketing Federation Ltd. and Ors. (supra) has construed section 80P widely and liberally, holding that if a society were to avail of several heads of deduction, and if it fell within any one head of deduction, it would be free from tax notwithstanding that the conditions of another head of deduction are not satisfied; (IV) This is for the reason that when the legislature wanted to restrict the deduction to a particular type of co-operative society, such as is evident from section 80P(2)(b) qua milk co-operative societies, the legislature expressly says so - which is not the case with section 80P(2)(a)(i); (V) That section 80P(4) is in the nature of a proviso to the main provision contained in section 80P(1) and (2). This proviso specifically excludes only co- operative banks, which are cooperative societies who must possess a licence from the RBI to do banking business. Given the fact that the assessee in that case was not so licenced, the assessee would not fall within the mischief of section 80P(4).”

4.

Respectfully following the precedent as above, I set aside the order of learned CIT(A) and decide the issue in favour of the assessee.

5.

In the result, appeal stands allowed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 2.05.2022.

More judgments on Section 80P(2)(d)

All 2,440 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80P(2)(d) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →