PARVEEN KUMAR JAIN,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE-63(1), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1065/DEL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 March 2021AY 2015-163 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for the assessment year 2015-16. The assessee subsequently requested withdrawal of the appeal.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “SMC-I”: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI & SHRI K NARASIMHA CHARY

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Jain, CA
For Respondent: Shri Vijay Kumar Kataria, Sr.DR
Hearing: 22.03.2021

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 07.12.2018 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)- 20 New Delhi relating to assessment year 2015-16.

2.

The Ld. Counsel for the assessee, vide application dated 19.3.2021 has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him on the ground that he has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 and certificate to this effect in Form No. 5 has already been obtained.

3.

Learned Sr. DR has no objection for withdrawal of the appeal.

4.

In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →