PRATAP K.PATEL,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CC-17, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 8544/DEL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 March 2021AY 2012-132 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal as they opted to settle the tax dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate under the scheme was also filed.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee due to opting for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 5(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’ NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA

For Respondent: Shri M. Barnwal, Sr. DR
Hearing: 25.03.2021Pronounced: 25.03.2021

PER G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT

1.

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax(A)-27, New Delhi dated 13.09.2019 and pertains to assessment year 2012-13.

The learned counsel for the assessee, vide letter dated 16th March, 2021, 2. has requested for withdrawal of the appeal and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.

3.

Learned Senior DR has no objection.

4.

In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 25th March, 2021.

More judgments on Section 5(1)

All 1,811 judgments and leading authorities on Section 5(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →