ESCOM CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD- 8(3), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3993/DEL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 March 2021AY 2013-142 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A) for AY 2013-14. The assessee subsequently requested withdrawal of the appeal.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal after opting for a tax settlement scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH, ‘B’: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA

For Respondent: Ms. Nidhi Srivastava, CIT-DR
Hearing: 25.03.2021Pronounced: 25.03.2021

ORDER PER R.K. PANDA, AM :

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 27.03.2018 of the learned CIT(A)-34, New Delhi, relating to Assessment Year 2013-14

2.

The learned counsel for the assessee, vide its letter, received through email, dated 24.03.2021, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (in short ‘the Act’) and requested for withdrawal of the said appeal.

3.

Considering the aforesaid situation, the captioned appeal is consigned to records and treated as dismissed.

4.

However, the aforesaid is subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the aforestated Act, the appellant (i.e., the assessee) shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application appropriately as per law.

The respondent (i.e., the Revenue) has no objection with regard to the aforesaid caveat.

5.

In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is consigned to record and, for statistical purposes, is treated as dismissed.

Above decision was pronounced in the open court in presence of both the sides on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 25th March, 2021.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →