GALAXY BUILDERS P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL.CIT, SPECIAL RANGE-4, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal decided to consign the appeal to records and treat it as dismissed. This is subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, the assessee can approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for assessment year 2014-15. Nobody appeared for the assessee during the virtual hearing. The assessee had opted to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, and requested withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal due to opting for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU & BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVASHRI SHRI
PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU, , , , VP PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU VP VP : VP This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2014-15 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-35, New Delhi dated 1st December, 2017.
Nobody appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of Virtual Hearing before us. The assessee, vide letter dated 16th March, 2021, has intimated the Tribunal that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (in short ‘the Act’) and requested for withdrawal of the said appeal.
2 ITA-2092/Del/2018
Considering the aforesaid situation, the captioned appeal is consigned to records and treated as dismissed.
However, the aforesaid is subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the aforestated Act, the appellant (i.e., the assessee) shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application appropriately as per law. The respondent (i.e., the Revenue) has no objection with regard to the aforesaid caveat.
In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is consigned to record and, for statistical purposes, is treated as dismissed.
Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 25th March, 2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026