What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the issues contested in the appeal had been settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A). The assessee subsequently opted to settle the dispute under the Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, and filed the necessary form.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act.

M/S Talisma Corporation Private… vs DCIT | ITAT Bangalore 2022

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH : BANGALORE

Before: SHRI. CHANDRA POOJARI & SMT. BEENA PILLAI

For Appellant: Shri Sankarganesh K

ORDER

PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal by the assessee has been filed by assessee against the order dated 15.02.2018 by Ld.CIT(A)-7, Bangalore for assessment year 2009-10. 2. The assessee has filed a letter stating that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute in its appeal under Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. It is further stated that the assessee has filed Form No. 3 for the appeal filed by the assessee. Accordingly Page 2 of it is submitted that appeal of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn.

We heard Ld D.R, who did not object to the prayer of the assessee. Since the issues contested in the appeal of the assessee have been settled under the Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn. However, we give liberty to the assessee to seek recall of this order in accordance with law, if the circumstances so warrant.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 31st January, 2022.

M/S TALISMA CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-12(4), BANGALORE

What did the Tribunal hold?

What were the facts?

What were the issues?

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Recent GST High Court judgments