OMEGA MAGIC FOOD PVT. LTD.,FARIDABAD vs. ITO, WARD-2(5), FARIDABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 758/DEL/2020Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 April 2021AY 2012-132 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The appeal was treated as dismissed, with liberty to the assessee to seek reinstitution if the dispute is not resolved under the scheme.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal for AY 2012-13. During the virtual hearing, no one appeared for the assessee. The assessee had requested withdrawal of the appeal via email, stating they opted to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw an appeal due to opting for a tax settlement scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “SMC-2” BENCH: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT

Hearing: 15.04.2021Pronounced: 15.04.2021

ORDER PER KUL BHARAT, JM :

This appeal filed by the assessee for the assessment year 2012-13 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A), Faridabad dated 23.01.2020.

2.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of Virtual hearing before us. The assessee, vide its letter dated 12.04.2021, received through email, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the ”Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”.

3.

Considering the aforesaid situation, the captioned appeal is consigned to records and treated as dismissed.

4.

However, the aforesaid is subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the aforestated Act, the appellant (i.e., the assessee) shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application appropriately as per law.

The respondent (i.e., the Revenue) has no objection with regard to the aforesaid caveat.

5.

In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is consigned to record and, for statistical purposes, is treated as dismissed.

Above decision was pronounced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 15th April, 2021.

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →