MRS. SPUREET KAUR NAGI,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CC-20, MUMBAI

ITA 6458/MUM/2019Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 May 2022AY 2008-0971 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal deleted the addition of ₹2,69,736/- as the assessee's explanation of cash withdrawals and redeposits was deemed sufficient. The addition of ₹1,30,000/- was also partly deleted, considering it as gifts rather than loans. The disallowance of expenditure was restricted to 10%.

What were the facts?

The assessee's bank account showed unexplained credits, and business expenditures were disallowed due to lack of third-party evidence. A search conducted on the assessee's group led to these assessment proceedings.

What were the issues?

Whether unexplained credits in bank accounts and disallowance of business expenses were justified. The Tribunal also examined the taxability of gifts and the validity of additions based on jewelry transaction slips.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 69A,Section 37(1),Section 56(1)(v),Section 69B

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH,

Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, AM & SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, JM

For Appellant: Shri Jayesh Dadia, AR
For Respondent: Shri Shekhar L. Gajbhiye, CIT DR
Hearing: 09.03.2022Pronounced: 31.05.2022

PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, AM:

01.

These are the seven appeals filed by one Assessee Mrs Supreet Kaur Nagi [Assessee/ Appellant] for seven assessment years where in assessment is made by the Assessing officer pursuant to search on 30/5/2008. Many of the issues involved in these appeals are common. Both the parties argued them together and therefore these [7] appeals are disposed by this common order. ITA no.6835, 6458, 5940–5944/Mum/2019 M₹ Supreet Kaur nagi; A.Ys. 2003–04 to 09–10 ITA No. 5940/Mum/2019 AY 2003-04

02.

ITA No. 5940/Mum/2019 is filed

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 69A

All 15,297 judgments and leading authorities on Section 69A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →