INCOME-TAX OFFICER,, JALNA vs. MORESHWAR MAHILA PRATHMIK GRAHAK PAT SANSTHA MARYADIT,, JALNA

Despite service of notice, none appeared on behalf of assessee nor any application was moved for adjournment. However, since the tax effect involved in the present appeal is less than monetary limit prescribed by CBDT, we proceed to decide the present appeal after hearing the learned Departmental Representative for the Revenue.

The CBDT vide Circular No.3/2018, dated 11.07.2018 has revised the monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before the Tribunal with retrospective effect. The tax effect in dispute in the captioned appeal is stated to be below the monetary limit of ₹ 20.00 lakhs specified in the CBDT Circular dated 11.07.2018 (supra).

In this background, the learned Departmental Representative for the Revenue was required to state his position; he has not referred to any material which would show that the captioned appeal is protected by any of the exceptions provided in para 10 of the Circular (supra).

Without going into the merits of the issues raised in the captioned appeal, this appeal is deemed to be withdrawn/not pressed as its filing is in contravention of the CBDT Circular dated 11.07.2018 (supra). Before parting, we clarify here that the Revenue shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution of appeal, if the requisite material is brought to show that the appeal is protected by the exceptions prescribed in para 10 of the Circular (supra).

In conclusion, by applying the CBDT Circular dated 11.07.2018 (supra), the captioned appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as withdrawn/not pressed.

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is dismissed.