THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRLCLE-1, KAKINADA vs. G. NARAYANA RAO, KAKINADA
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Revenue's appeal was not maintainable as it should have filed two separate appeals. The assessee's cross-objection was partly allowed as it raised a valid point regarding the appeal filing.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed a single appeal against two separate assessment orders, and there was a delay in filing. The assessee also filed a cross-objection raising the same issue regarding the single appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether a single appeal can be filed against multiple assessment orders, and the validity of reassessment proceedings based on a change of opinion.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Kelvinator of India Ltd.1,673 citing320 ITR 561 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO, HON’BLE & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, HON’BLE
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 593/VIZ/2018 (Asst. Year : 2009-10) The ACIT, Circle-1, vs. Grandhi Narayana Rao, Kakinada. Prop. : Sri Dhana Lakshmi Oil & General Merchants, D.No.27-9-14/1, Pulavarthy Street, Kakinada. PAN No. ABQPG 1242 D (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O.No. 19/VIZ/2019 (Arising out of ITA No. 593/VIZ/2018) (Asst. Year : 2009-10) Grandhi Narayana Rao, vs. The ACIT, Circle-1, Prop. : Sri Dhana Lakshmi Oil Kakinada. & General Merchants, D.No. 27-9-14/1, Pulavarthy Street, Kakinada. PAN No. ABQPG 1242 D (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri G.V.N. Hari – Advocate. Department By : Smt. Suman Malik – Sr.DR Date of hearing : 29/07/2019. Date of pronouncement : 07/08/2019. O R D E R PER V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER
This appeal by the Revenue and the Cross Objection by the assessee are directed against the order of Commissioner of
2 ITA No.593/VIZ/2018 C.O.No.19/VIZ/2019 (G. Narayana Rao) Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Visakhapatnam, dated 29/06/2018 for the Assessment Year 2009-10. 2. When this appeal is taken up for hearing, ld. counsel for the assessee has submitted that the Department has to file two separate appeals against two separate assessment orders, but filed a single appeal, which is not maintainable. 3. We find that there is a delay of 16 days in filing the appeal. The Revenue has filed the condonation application for 11 days. This defect was brought to the notice of the ld.DR on 31/01/2019, who sought time to rectify the Form No.36. One more defect is noticed in this appeal is that the Assessing Officer has passed the order u/sec. 143(3) on 30/12/2010 and also passed order u/sec. 143(3) r.w.s. 147 on 18/06/2014, by which, the Revenue has preferred this appeal against both the orders. So far as order u/sec. 143(3) passed by the Assessing Officer is concerned, the ld.CIT(A) deleted the addition by observing that the approach of the Assessing Officer is not justified. So far as order u/sec.143(3) r.w.s. 147 is concerned, it is only mere change of opinion and by following the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of CIT Vs. Kelvinator India Ltd. [(320 ITR 561 (SC)] has held that notice is invalid and the reassessment proceedings are void ab initio. These two separate assessment orders passed by the Assessing
3 ITA No.593/VIZ/2018 C.O.No.19/VIZ/2019 (G. Narayana Rao) Officer, though ld. CIT(A) has passed combined order dated 29/06/2018, the Department has to file two separate appeals before the Tribunal instead of that, one appeal has been filed. This was brought to the notice of the ld.DR on 31/01/2019 and subsequently on four occasions, ld.DR has submitted that the present appeal filed by the Department would be withdrawn with liberty to file two separate appeals, but neither withdrawn the appeal nor filed separate appeals, and even not filed proper condonation application. In view of the above, the appeal filed by the Department is dismissed in limine. 4. So far as Cross Objection is concerned, the assessee has raised a ground that the Revenue has to file two separate appeals against the two separate assessment orders. As we have decided this issue in Revenue’s appeal, this cross objection filed by the assessee is partly allowed. 5. In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed and the cross objection filed by the assessee is partly allowed. Order Pronounced in open Court on this 07th day of August, 2019.
Sd/- sd/- (D.S. SUNDER SINGH) (V. DURGA RAO) Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated: 07th August, 2019.
4 ITA No.593/VIZ/2018 C.O.No.19/VIZ/2019 (G. Narayana Rao) vr/- Copy to: 1. The Assessee – Grandhi Narayana Rao, Prop. : Sri Dhana Lakshmi Oil & General Merchants, D.No.27-9-14/1, Pulavarthy Street, Kakinada. 2. The Revenue – The ACIT, Circle-1, Kakinada. 3. The Pr.CIT (Central), Visakhapatnam. 4. The CIT(A)-3, Visakhapatnam. 5. The D.R., Visakhapatnam. 6. Guard file. By order
(VUKKEM RAMBABU) Sr. Private Secretary, ITAT, Visakhapatnam.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026