NANAK CHAND TRUST,MEERUT vs. ITO(EXEMPTION), GHAZIABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee requested to withdraw their appeal for AY 2014-15. This was due to opting for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee's request for withdrawal of appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme should be accepted.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘C’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI KUL BHARAT
ORDER PER G.S. PANNU, VP :
This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2014-15 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-Meerut, dated 14.08.2018.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of virtual hearing.
The learned counsel for the assessee, vide its letter dated 12.03.2021, received by email’, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated
2 ITA-5752/Del/2018 that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.
Learned Senior DR has no objection.
In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 15th April, 2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Sharma vs. Union Of INDIA Rep Thr The Intelligence Officer, Directorate General Of GST Intelligence (Dggi)Jharkhand · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Om.S.R. Construction, Through Its Proprietor Mr. Kuldeep Sharma vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through Its Commissioner, Commerical Tax DepartmentJharkhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026