SOURABH ABROL,DELHI vs. ITO, WARD- II(4), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1307/DEL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 April 2021AY 2014-152 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A) order for AY 2014-15. The assessee subsequently requested to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘C’ NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI KUL BHARAT

For Respondent: Shri R.K. Gupta, Sr. DR
Hearing: 15.04.2021Pronounced: 15.04.2021

PER G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT

1.

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax(A), Faridabad dated 26.12.2017 and pertains to assessment year 2014-15.

2.

The learned counsel for the assessee, vide letter dated 6.3.2021, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under ITA 1307/Del/2018 consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.

3.

Learned Senior DR has no objection.

4.

In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 15th April, 2021.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →