INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(3), PUNE vs. VINAYAK SORTE, (L/H OF SMT. KRISHNABAI D. SORTE), PUNE
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal decided to dismiss the appeals as withdrawn/not pressed. This decision was based on a CBDT circular revising monetary limits for filing appeals.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed two appeals before the ITAT, Pune, for assessment year 2008-09. The appeals were against orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeals filed by the Revenue were maintainable given the low tax effect, which fell below the revised monetary limits set by the CBDT.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आदेश / ORDER PER SUSHMA CHOWLA :
These two appeals filed by Revenue are against respective order/s of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 3, relating to the
ITA 1818 & 1819/PUN/2017
assessment year 2008-09 against respective order/s passed under
different section/s of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’).
These two appeals filed by the Revenue relating to different
assessees on similar issue were heard together and are being disposed
of by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience.
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax has filed letter/s
withdrawing the appeals filed by Revenue because of low tax effect.
We proceed to decide the present appeals because of low tax effect
after hearing both the learned Departmental Representative and
learned Authorised Representative.
The CBDT vide Circular No.3/2018, dated 11.07.2018 has
revised the monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before the Tribunal with retrospective effect. The tax effect in dispute
in the captioned appeals is stated to be below the monetary limit of ₹ 20.00 lakhs specified in the CBDT Circular dated 11.07.2018
(supra).
Without going into the merit of the issues raised in the captioned
appeals, this bunch of appeals are deemed to be withdrawn/not
pressed as their filing is in contravention of the CBDT Circular dated
11.07.2018 (supra).
In conclusion, by applying the CBDT Circular dated 11.07.2018
(supra), the captioned appeals of the Revenue are dismissed as
withdrawn/not pressed.
ITA 1818 & 1819/PUN/2017
In the result, both the appeals of Revenue are dismissed.
Order pronounced on this 19th day of August, 2019.
Sd/- Sd/- (ANIL CHATURVEDI) (SUSHMA CHOWLA) लेखा सद�य / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER �या�यक सद�य / JUDICIAL MEMBER
पुणे Pune; �दनांक Dated : 19th August, 2019. Yamini
आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to :
अपीलाथ� / The Appellant; 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent; 3. The CIT(A)-3, Pune. 4. The Pr.CIT-2, Pune. 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, “बी” / DR, ITAT, “B” Pune; 6. गाड� फाईल / Guard file.
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER
// True Copy //
व�र�ठ �नजी स�चव / Sr. Private Secretary आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026