SEVA BHARTI,RANCHI vs. ITO (EXEMPTION) WARD, RANCHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the rectification petitions were time-barred as they were filed after the expiry of the four-year period stipulated under Section 154(7) of the Act. However, the Assessing Officer was directed to recompute the Section 234B interest as per the jurisdictional High Court's decision.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable institution, filed rectification petitions under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking correction of errors in their assessment orders for AY 2009-10 and 2010-11. These petitions were filed beyond the statutory time limit.
What were the issues?
Whether rectification petitions filed beyond the statutory time limit under Section 154 are maintainable. Whether Section 234B interest should be computed on returned or assessed income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH “SMC”, RANCHI
Before: SH. S.S.GODARA
PER SH. S.S.GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER These two assessee’s appeals for AY 2009-10 & 2010-11 arise against the order dated 08.06.2018 passed by the CIT(A), Ranchi in Appeal No.CIT(A), Ranchi/10187/2017-18 and CIT(A), Ranchi/10188/2017-18 respectively, in proceedings u/s 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”). Heard both the parties. Case files perused.
Ld. Counsel at the outset takes me to CIT(A)’s identical discussion upholding the Assessing Officer’s action declining its section 154 petition with the following reasoning:- 5. “The appellant stated that the appellant is a charitable institution having registration u/s 12AA of the Act. Income of the appellant was exempt in the past and in the future Assessment Years.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026