M/S MANAN VIDYA,RANCHI vs. ITO WARD-3(2), RANCHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to compute the interest under Section 234B strictly on the returned income, rather than the income assessed by the Assessing Officer, following a jurisdictional High Court decision.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal for AY 2007-08 was filed against an order passed by the CIT(A) in proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. The sole issue raised by the assessee concerned the computation of interest under Section 234B.
What were the issues?
The key issue was whether interest under Section 234B should be computed on returned income or assessed income. The Tribunal considered the applicability of a High Court ruling on this matter.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH “SMC”, RANCHI
Before: SH. S.S.GODARA
PER SH. S.S.GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER This assessee’s appeal for AY 2007-08 arises against the order dated 03.10.2016 passed by the CIT(A), Ranchi in Appeal No.120/ Ran/Oth/15-16 in proceedings u/s 147 of the Income tax Act, 1961 (in short “Act”). Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
The assessee’s sole issue canvassed in this instant appeal relates to section 234B interest computation. Hon’ble juri ictional high court in Ajay Prakash Verma, T.A.No.38 of 2010 reported in 2013(1) TMI 140 has categorically held that the impugned interest has to be computed only on returned income than that assessed by the Assessing Officer. I, therefore, direct the AO to compute the impugned interest strictly in tune with hon’ble juri ictional high court above stated decision.
This assessee’s a
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 234B
- Vikas Ashokkumar Masand, Ahmedabad vs The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3130/AHD/2026[A.Y. 2017-18]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Sarvjeet Singh Through Legal Heir Manjit… vs ITO Ward 1(1), AlwarITA 355/JPR/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026