SRI RAVINDER KUMAR,BOKARO vs. ITO, BOKARO
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal deleted the Section 40A(3) disallowance for fire cracker purchases, finding justifiable reasons for cash payments. It also deleted a gift addition as the same amount was already taxed in the donor's hands and restricted another gift addition.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against CIT(A) orders concerning disallowances under Section 40A(3) for cash purchases, additions on account of gifts, and issues related to Section 44AF and credit balances. The Tribunal considered cash payments for fire crackers, gifts from relatives, and other additions.
What were the issues?
Whether cash payments for fire cracker purchases were justifiable under Rule 6DD and if gift additions were correctly made when the same income was taxed in the donor's hands.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 40A(3),Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 263,Section 44AF,Section 234B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI
Before: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini
PER BENCH:- These three assessee’s appeals for assessment year(s) 2007-08, 2008- 09 & 2009-10 arise against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- Hazaribag’s separate orders; all dated 23.06.2016, passed in case Nos.31, 36, 37/HZB/2015-116 involving proceedings u/s 263 r.w.s 143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short ‘the Act’. Heard both the parties. Case file(s) perused.
We come to first common issue of sec.40A(3) disallowance in fire crackers purchases in cash amounting to Rs.16,39,774/-, Rs.27,91,348/- &10,50,000/- made by the Assessing Officer affirmed in the CIT(A
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 40A(3)
- Rekha Agarwal, Jaipur vs ITO WD 4(1), JaipurITA 844/JPR/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Infra Developers, Shivpuri vs Income Tax Officer, AshoknagarITA 454/AGR/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Saiyed Zaharul Alam, Murshidabad vs I.T.O., Ward - 42(1), MurshidabadITA 2233/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- M/S Sadana Electric Store, Lucknow vs DCIT Range-6, LucknowITA 283/LKW/2024[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Nagendra Prasad, Patna vs ITO Ward -5(3) Patna, Dak BanglowITA 362/PAT/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026