M/S COMPREHENSIVE NEOMARKETING SYSTEM PVT. LTD.,RANCHI vs. ACIT, CENTRALISED PROCESSING CELL-TDS, GHAZIABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 234E is a charging provision and cannot be applied retrospectively without express provision. Since Section 200A of the Act did not have an enabling provision for levying this fee prior to June 1, 2015, the levy was invalid for the period in question.
What were the facts?
The appeals concerned the levy of late fee under Section 234E of the Income Tax Act for assessment years prior to June 1, 2015. The lower authorities had levied the fee based on the Gujarat High Court's decision in Rajesh Kaurani, while the assessees relied on ITAT decisions holding the fee non-applicable retrospectively.
What were the issues?
Whether the late fee under Section 234E is applicable for TDS statement filing delays prior to June 1, 2015, given the absence of enabling provisions in Section 200A.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(7)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd.2,664 citing88 ITR 192 · 1973 · SC
- Fatehraj Singhvi v. UOI1,778 citing73 Taxmann.com 252 · 2016 · HC
- Kourani v. Union OF India1,708 citing83 Taxmann.com 137 · 2017 · HC
- CIT v. Vatika Township Pvt. Ltd.1,558 citing367 ITR 466 · 2014 · SC · Read judgment
- Fateh Raj Singhvi & Ors. v. UOI844 citing289 CTR 602 · 2016 · HC
- Sibia Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT(TDS)148 citing121 DTR 81 · 2015
- Gajanan Constructions v. Dy, CIT143 citing161 ITD 313 · 2016 · ITAT
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RANCHI BENCH “SMC” RANCHI Before Shri S.S, Godara, Judicial Member ITA No.21-24/Ran/2017 Assessment Year:2013-14 Shree Balaji Steel Works ACIT, CPC, बनाम / Marwari Para Road, Gaziabad V/s. Jugsalai, Jamshedpur-831006 [PAN No. ABBFS 3293 H] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent None आवेदक क" ओर से/By Assessee Shri Chandan Das, JCIT-DR राज"व क" ओर से/By Revenue ITA No.250-251/Ran/2018 Assessment Year:2013-14 (Q4-26Q)(Q-3-24Q)
M/s Comprehensive ACIT, Centrallised बनाम / Neomarketing System Pvt. Processing Cell-TDS, V/s. Ltd. Rattanlall Surajmull Aayakar Bhawan, Compound, C.N. Tower, 56- Sesctoro-3, Vaishali, Main Road, Ranchi-834001 Ghaziabad, U.P. [PAN No. AAECC 1221 E] 201010 .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent
ITA No.252-255/Ran/2018 Assessment Year:2013-14 (Q2-26Q)(Q-2-24Q) Assessment Year:2014-15 (Q2-26Q)(Q1-26Q) C.N. Automobiles ACIT, Centrallised बनाम / Rattanlall Surajmull Processing Cell-TDS, V/s. Compound, C.N. Tower, 56- Aayakar Bhawan, Main Road, Ranchi-834001 Sesctoro-3, Vaishali, [PAN No. AAHFC 9438 P] Ghaziabad, U.P. 201010
ITA No.21-24/R/17, 250-259/R/18 AYs 13-14 Shri Balaji Steel Works, M/s Comprehensive Neomarketing Sy
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 234E
- Mulchand Ramkishan Laddha, Pune vs Income Tax Officer (TDS-2), PuneITA 874/PUN/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2669/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2668/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2667/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2666/PUN/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026