SRI SAI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,MAHBUBNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, MAHBUBNAGAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) should have decided the appeals on merits and could not pass ex-parte orders. The Assessing Officer was directed to pass a reasoned order regarding the adoption of the maximum marginal rate.
What were the facts?
The assessee could not appear before the CIT(A) due to unavoidable circumstances, leading to ex-parte orders. The Assessing Officer also adopted the maximum marginal rate without providing reasons.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) can pass ex-parte orders without deciding on merits, and whether the Assessing Officer must provide reasons for adopting the maximum marginal rate.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Multiplan India Ltd.2,267 citing38 ITD 320 · 1991 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD “SMC” BENCH, HYDERABAD
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO, HON’BLE
These appeals by the assessee are directed against the separate orders of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Hyderabad, all dated 18/06/2018 for the Assessment Years 2007-08, 2008-09, 2010-11 & 2011-12. 2. When these appeals are taken up for hearing, ld. counsel for the assessee has made a detailed submission and also submitted that he could not appear before the ld.CIT(A) due to circumstances beyond his control. However, he further submitted that the ld.CIT(A) has passed an exparte order without deciding the appeals
2 ITA Nos.1806-1809/HYD/2018 (M/s. Sri Sai Educational Society)
on merits. Therefore, the orders passed by the ld.CIT(A) may be set aside. It is also submitted that the Assessing Officer assessed the income of the assessee by adopting maximum marginal rate without giving any reasons and submitted that Assessing Officer may be directed to pass a reasoned order. 3. On the other hand, ld. Departmental Representative strongly supported the orders passed by the authorities below. 4. I have heard both the parties, perused the material on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below. 5. In these cases, the assessee could not appear before the ld.CIT(A) though as many as opportunities were given. However, the ld.CIT(A) instead of adjudicating the appeals on merits, passed exparte orders. I find that the ld.CIT(A) has no power to pass exparte order by applying Multiplan (India) Ltd.’s case (38 ITD 320) and ought to have been passed the orders on merits of the cases. So far as another argument of the ld. counsel for the assessee is concerned, the assessee is being an educational institution, when the Assessing Officer adopting maximum marginal rate, he ought to have been specified in the assessment order why he adopted maximum marginal rate. Therefore, I direct the Assessing Officer to pass a detailed order in respect of adopting maximum marginal rate. In view of the above, I set aside the order passed by the
3 ITA Nos.1806-1809/HYD/2018 (M/s. Sri Sai Educational Society)
ld.CIT(A) and remit the issue back to the file of the Assessing Officer to pass a reasoned order in accordance with law after giving affordable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Thus, these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose. 6. In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose. Order Pronounced in open Court on this 17th day of May, 2019. Sd/- (V. DURGA RAO) Judicial Member Dated: 17th May, 2019. vr/- Copy to: 1. The Assessee - M/s. Sri Sai Educational Society, 1-4- 130/18, Sana Complex, Opp. Govt. Hospital, Mahbubnagar. 2. The Revenue-ITO, Ward-1, Mahbubnagar. 3. The Pr.CIT-4, Hyderabad. 4. The CIT(A)-4, Hyderabad. 5. The D.R., Hyderabad. 6. Guard file. By order
Sr. Private Secretary, ITAT, Hyderabad.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026