SHRIRAM ENTERPRISES,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 12 (4),, PUNE

Without going to the grounds of appeal, at the outset, ld. Counsel for the assessee brought my attention to the appellate order and mentioned that the same is an ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A). Further, ld. Counsel mentioned that the assessee could not appear before the CIT(A) for all justifiable reasons. On these facts, ld. Counsel made a statement at Bar that this time the assessee would make proper representation before the CIT(A) and pleaded for grant of one more opportunity of being heard to the assessee before the First Appellate Authority.

Heard both the sides. Considering the above facts, I am of the opinion that the right of filing the appeal is granted by the Statute to the assessee-taxpayers. In this case, the assessee wanted to invoke the said right and paid the appeal fees too in this regard conveying his seriousness of pursuing the appeal. Therefore, I am of the opinion that an opportunity should be granted to the assessee under consideration. Accordingly, I remand all the issues raised by the assessee in its appeal to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. The CIT(A) shall pass a speaking order after granting reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee as per set principles of natural justice. Accordingly, the grounds raised by the assessee in its appeal are allowed for statistical purposes.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on this 07th day of October, 2019. (D. KARUNAKARA RAO) लेखा सद" / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; "दनांक Dated : 07th October, 2019. Sujeet आदेश क" "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत/Copy of the Order is forwarded to : अपीलाथ" / The Appellant;

The CCIT, Pune; िवभागीय "ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे “एक-सद"य मामला” /

DR ‘SMC’, ITAT, Pune; गाड" फाईल / Guard file. 6. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, स"यािपत "ित //// Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune