RAJENDRA HANMANT YOGE,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1 (5), PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1160/PUN/2019Status: DisposedITAT Pune07 October 2019AY 2015-162 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal acknowledged the assessee's right to appeal and the circumstances preventing their appearance. It granted the assessee a fresh opportunity to present their case before the CIT(A).

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) resulted in an ex-parte order because the assessee could not appear. The assessee claimed a change of address led to non-service of notices.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee should be granted a fresh opportunity to be heard by the CIT(A) after an ex-parte order was passed due to non-appearance.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE

Before: SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa Khare, Shri D. Y. Pandit
For Respondent: Shri Pravin Chavan
Hearing: 07.10.2019Pronounced: 07.10.2019

PER D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM : This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A)-3, Pune dated 14.09.2018 for the Assessment Year 2015-16. CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order

2.

Without going to the grounds of appeal, at the outset, ld. Counsel for the assessee brought my attention to the appellate order and mentioned that the same is an ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A). Further, ld. Counsel submitted that this is a case where the assessee desires to go back to the file of the CIT(A) for one more round of proceedings as the assessee could not be present before the CIT(A) for one reason or other. The discussion given in para 5 of the order of the CIT(A) is relevant. On these facts, ld. Counsel made a statement at Bar that this time the assessee would make proper representation before the CIT(A) and pleaded for grant of one more opportunity of being heard to the assessee before the First Appellate Authority. There is change of address of the assessee and the same explains the failure of the Revenue to serve the notices on the assessee validly.

3.

Heard both the sides. Considering the above facts, I am of the opinion that the right of filing the appeal is granted by the Statute to the assessee-taxpayers. In this case, the assessee wanted to invoke the said right and paid the appeal fees too in this regard conveying his seriousness of pursuing the appeal. Therefore, I am of the opinion that an opportunity should be granted to the assessee under consideration. Accordingly, I remand all the issues raised by the assessee in his appeal to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. The CIT(A) shall pass a speaking order after granting reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee as per set principles of natural justice. Accordingly, the grounds raised by the assessee in his appeal are allowed for statistical purposes.

4.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on this 07th day of October, 2019. (D. KARUNAKARA RAO) लेखा सद" / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; "दनांक Dated : 07th October, 2019. Sujeet आदेश क" "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत/Copy of the Order is forwarded to : अपीलाथ" / The Appellant;

1.

""यथ" / The Respondent;

2.3.

The CIT(A)-3, Pune;

4.

The Pr. CCIT, Pune; िवभागीय "ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे “एक-सद"य मामला” /

5.

DR ‘SMC’, ITAT, Pune; गाड" फाईल / Guard file. 6. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, स"यािपत "ित //// Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →