SHRI RAKESH AGARWAL,NAGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, NAGAON
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the issue of applicability of section 40A(3) disallowance for cash purchases was not raised before the lower appellate authorities. Therefore, the matter was remitted back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal concerned the computation of income under section 115JC(2) regarding cash payments for soil used in brick production. The assessee argued that these cash purchases were not covered by the disallowance provision.
What were the issues?
Whether cash purchases for brick production are subject to disallowance under Section 40A(3) and if a new ground can be raised before the Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, GUWAHATI BENCH, GUWAHATI
Before: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini
आदेश/O R D E R PER BENCH:-
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2015-16 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-Guwahati-1’s order dated 24.09.2018 passed in case No.381409331310118/114 involving proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short ‘the Act’. Heard both the parties. Case file perused. 2. It transpires during the course of hearing that the instant lis involves the assessee’s sole substantive grievance canvassed in his pleadings that the learned lower authorities have wrongly made sec.115JC(2) computation regarding the cash payments for purchasing soil for the purpose of brick production in the kiln question. Learned counsel’s sole argument raised during the course of hearing is that such soil and other materials purchased through
ITA No.356/Gau/2018 A.Y. 2015-16 Page 2 Rakesh Agarwal Vs. ITO Wd-22, Nagaon cash does not come within the purview of impugned disallowance provision. The Revenue’s case on the other hand is that the assessee has not raised such a ground either in the instant appeal or before the CIT(A). The assessee at this stage quotes hon’ble apex court’s decision in NTPC vs. CIT (1998) 229 ITR 383 (SC) settling the law that we can very well entertain such a new question in respect of appellate proceeding. Be that as it may, the fact remains that the assessee had not agigated the instant legal/technical issue in the lower appellate proceedings. We therefore remit the instant lis back to the CIT(A) for afresh adjudication regarding applicability of sec.40A(3) disallowance qua the assessee’s cash purchases for the purpose of his brick kiln production as per law. 3. This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes in foregoing terms. Order pronounced in the open court 03/07/2019 Sd/- Sd/- (लेखा �è�) (Û�ȡǓ��� �è�) ( A.L.Saini) (S.S.Godara) (Accountant Member) (Judicial Member) Guwahati, *Dkp Ǒ��ȡȲ�Ȭ- 03/07/2019 गू�ȡ¡ ȡ�Ȥ । आदेश�ȧ ĤǓ�ͧ�ͪ�\ Ē ȯͪ��/ Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. \ �Ȣ�ȡ�ȸ/Appellant-Rakesh Agarwal, C/o Satyyanarayan Agarwal, Dacapatty, Nagaon 2. Ĥ×��ȸ/Respondent-ITO Wd-2, Aayakar Bhawan, Nagaon, Asasm 3. Ȳ�Ȳͬ���] ����] �ǕÈ��Ǚ�ȡ¡ ȡ�Ȥ/ Concerned CIT Guwahati 4. ] ����] �ǕÈ�- अपील/ CIT (A) Guwahati 5. ͪ��ȡ�Ȣ��ĤǓ�Ǔ�ͬ�, ] ����\ �Ȣ�ȣ��\ ͬ����, गू�ȡ¡ ȡ�Ȥ��Ȳ��Ȣ�/ DR, ITAT, Guwahati 6. �ȡ�[��ȡ^�/ Guard file. By order/आदेश से, /True copy/ Sr. Private Secretary (on tour) ] ����\ �Ȣ�ȣ��\ ͬ����, गू�ȡ¡ ȡ�Ȥ ।
More judgments on Section 115JC
- Braithwaite & Co. Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 1(1), KolkataITA 1076/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- Ab Knowledge Systems, Pune vs DCIT, PuneITA 92/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Jain Pravin Hiralal HUF, Pune vs ITO Ward 6(1), PuneITA 1072/PUN/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Amey Madhav Baitule, India vs ITO Ward 3(1), KalyanITA 8671/MUM/2025[2020-2021]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2026AY 2020-2021
- Laxmi Shelters, Surat vs Dy. CIT, Circle-1(3), SuratITA 160/SRT/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026