LAXMI NARAYAN TEMPLE,VALSAD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the ex-parte order passed by the CIT(Exemptions) and restored the issue back to the CIT's file. The CIT was directed to pass a speaking order after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an application for registration under Section 12AA. The CIT(Exemptions) passed an ex-parte order rejecting the application without providing proper notice or opportunity to the assessee. The assessee's representative offered an oral undertaking to participate in the proceedings.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemptions) erred in passing an ex-parte order without providing adequate notice and opportunity to the assessee for registration under Section 12AA.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SMT. DIVA SINGH & SHRI O.P.MEENA
Laxmi Narayan Temple Vs. CIT(Exemptions), Ahd/ITA No.434/SRT/2018 Page 1 of 2 आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,सुरत �यायपीठ, सुरत IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SURAT BENCH, SURAT �ीमती िदवा िसंह, �ाियक सद� तथा �ी ओ.पी.मीना, लेखा सद� के सम� BEFORE SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O.P.MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आ.अ.सं./I.T.A. No.434/SRT/2018 िनधा�रण वष�/Assessment Year : - Laxmi Narayan Temple, Vs. The Commissioner of Income Pali Karambeli, Bhilad, Valsad – Tax(Exemptions), 396 155. Ahmedabad – 380 009. [PAN: AAATL 2252 R] अपीलाथ� Appellant ��यथ�/Respondent Shri Suresh Kabra – CA िनधा�रती क� ओर से /Assessee by Shri P.S.Choudhary – Sr.DR राज�व क� ओर से /Revenue by 11.01.2019 सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date of hearing: 11.01.2019 उ�ोषणा क� तारीख/Pronouncement on: आदेश /O R D E R PER DIVA SINGH, JM: 1. The present appeal has been filed by the assessee assailing the correctness of the order u/s.12AA of CIT(Exemptions), Ahmedabad dated 10.05.2018. The ld.AR referring to the submissions in the early hearing application advance inviting attention to the Ground No.1 raised by the assessee in the present appeal made a prayer for a remand of issue to the file of the CIT(Exemption) giving his oral undertaking that the assessee shall participate in the assessment proceedings. The specific ground reads as under : “1. ON the facts and in circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) has erred in passing ex-parte order u/s.12AA of the Act without any notice on assessee.” The ld.Sr.DR was heard and posed no objection to the prayer for 2. remand. A perusal of the impugned order shows that the assessee who moved an application u/s.12AA in Form No.10A under rule 11AA which was received in the case of CIT-Exemption on 14.11.2017 the assessee was required to furnish certain details. However, on the specific date given
Laxmi Narayan Temple Vs. CIT(Exemptions), Ahd/ITA No.434/SRT/2018 Page 2 of 2 the assessee failed to appear. The ld.CIT(Exemptions) thereafter gave further opportunities. In the absence of requisite details made available which include survey copy of trustee the application of assessee was rejected. Accepting the oral undertaking given by the ld.AR in the light of the submissions of the parties before the Bench the issue is set-aside and restore back to the file of CIT(Exemptions), Ahmedabad with a direction pass a speaking order in accordance with law after giving assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The assessee is advised in its own interest to participate fully and fairly in the proceedings before the CIT(Exemption). Said order was pronounced in the open court at the time of hearing itself. 3. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for the statistical purpose as pronounced in the open court on 11.01.2019.
Sd/- Sd/- (ओ.पी.मीना/O.P.MEENA) (�ीमती िदवा िसंह /DIVA SINGH) लेखासद�यकेसम� /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (�याियकसद�यतथा/JUDICIAL MEMBER) सुरत/ Surat, �दनांक Dated: 11th January, 2019/S.Gangadhara Rao, Sr.PS Copy of order sent to- Assessee/AO/Pr. CIT/ CIT (A)/ ITAT (DR)/Guard file of ITAT. By order / / TRUE COPY / / Assistant Registrar, Surat
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026