M/S SAIFCO CEMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED,SRINAGAR vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SRINAGAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order, acknowledging the possibility of unintentional lapses and the turmoil in Jammu & Kashmir. The case was remanded to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision after providing reasonable opportunities to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed in limine due to non-prosecution, despite multiple opportunities being granted. The assessee failed to attend or file any adjournment applications or written replies.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal for non-prosecution without considering the possibility of unintentional lapses or external factors affecting the assessee's participation.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR
Before: SH. N.K.CHOUDHRY & DR. A.L.SAINI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR
BEFORE SH. N.K.CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. A.L.SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA No.639/Asr/2019 Assessment Year: 2007-08
Saifco Cements Pvt. Ltd., Asst. CIT, Circle-3, Srinagar Opposite Post Office, Batwara, Kashmir. Srinagar, Kashmir. Vs. [PAN:AAECS 8832M] (Appellant) (Respondent)
Appellant by : None Respondent by: Sh. Amar Pal Meena (Ld. DR)
Date of hearing: 25.11.2019 Date of pronouncement: 25.11.2019
ORDER PER N.K.CHOUDHRY, JM: This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee/Appellant against the order dated 08.08.2019 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-2, Jalandhar u/s 250(6) of the I.T. Act, 1961 (hereinafter called as ‘the Act’), by which the Ld. CIT(A) on non-prosecution dismissed the appeal of the assessee in limine.
From the order it reflects that several opportunities have been given to the assessee by issuing the notices from time to time on the address given by the appellant in Form No.35, however, on none of the dates, the assessee neither attended the appellate proceedings nor filed any adjournment application or written reply and in that eventuality despite giving several opportunities of being heard, it was
ITA N0.639/Asr/ 2019 (A.Y.2007-08) 2 Saifco Cements Pvt. Ltd., Vs. ACIT
observed by the Ld. CIT(A) that the appellant is not interested in pursuing its appeal. Therefore, he was pleased to dismiss the appeal.
We have given our thoughtful consideration to the order impugned herein. The Appellant did not bother to appear and co-ordinate with appellate proceedings even after affording several opportunities. Although the instant appeal of the assessee is liable to be dismissed in order to give effect to the principle that law does not assist the person who is inactive and sleeps over his rights by allowing them when challenged or disputed to remain dormant, without asserting them in a court of law. The, principle which forms the basis of this rule is expressed in the maxim vigilantibus, non dormientibus, jura subveniunt (Law assists those who are vigilant and not those who sleep over their rights), but even a vigilant litigant is prone to commit mistakes. As the aphorism to err is human and is more a practical notion of human behaviour than an abstract philosophy, the unintentional lapse on the part of a litigant should not normally cause the doors of the judicature permanently closed before him. The effort of the court should not be one of finding means to pull down the shutters of adjudicatory jurisdiction before a party who seeks justice, on account of any mistake committed by him, but to see whether it is possible to entertain his grievance if it is genuine, therefore, considering the peculiar facts and circumstances as the assessee having office in Jammu & Kashmir and there is a turmoil at every interval and even otherwise the ld. CIT(A) has not decided the appeal on merit, therefore, in our considered opinion, it would be appropriate to set aside the case to the file of the ld. CIT(A) for decision afresh, suffice to say while giving proper and reasonable opportunities of being heard to the assessee.
ITA N0.639/Asr/ 2019 (A.Y.2007-08) 3 Saifco Cements Pvt. Ltd., Vs. ACIT
We also feel it appropriate to direct the Assessee/Appellant to extend its full co-operation and participation in the appellate proceedings before the ld. CIT(A) as and when required and in case of further default, the assessee shall not be subjected to any leniency.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
Order pronounced in the open Court on 25/11/2019.
Sd/- Sd/- (DR.A.L.SAINI) (N.K.CHOUDHRY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 25/11/2019. /PK/ Ps. Copy forwarded to: 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. The CIT 4. Then CIT(Appeals) 5. SR DR, I.T.A.T. Amritsar 6. Guard File True Copy By Order
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dikshant Nim vs. Union Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Pankaj Patil vs. Branch Manager Hdfc BankMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Rudra Pratap Singh vs. The Union Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Laxman Singh Yadav vs. Bank Of BarodaMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Surendra Singh Rathore vs. Idfc First Bank Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026