KAIZEN IIT ACADEMY,BOKARO vs. ITO,WARD-3(3), BOKARO
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the appeal to the file of the CIT(A) to provide the assessee with another opportunity to present its case, considering the interest of justice and fair play.
What were the facts?
The assessee failed to appear before the CIT(A) and the appeal was dismissed ex parte. The assessee also did not appear before the ITAT, and no adjournment was sought.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be granted a fresh opportunity to present its case before the CIT(A) after an ex parte dismissal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, RANCHI
Before: SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG
This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Hazaribagh, dated 03.12.2018 for the assessment year 2015-2016. 2. None appeared on behalf of the assessee, even the case was called for second round hearing, neither any adjournment petition is filed by the assessee, therefore, I proceeded to dispose off the case after considering the submissions of the ld. DR and material available on record.
Ld. DR relied on the orders of CIT(A) and Assessing Officer and submitted that the assessee deliberate not appeared before the CIT(A), therefore, appeal of the assessee deserves to be dismissed.
I have heard the submissions of ld. DR and perused the relevant material placed in the record of the Tribunal. I find that the appeal of the assessee filed before the CIT(A) has been dismissed ex parte by the CIT(A). Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice and fair-play, there will be no loss to the Revenue if one more opportunity be granted to the assessee to represent its case before the CIT(A). Accordingly, I restore the appeal of the assessee to the file of CIT(A) for fresh adjudication of the appeal of the assessee, after providing sufficient opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to cooperate with the AO in early disposal of the case.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 24/05/2019. (CHANDRA MOHAN GARG) न्यानयक सदस्य / JUDICIAL MEMBER रााँची/Ranchi; ददनांक Dated 24/05/2019 Prakash Kumar Mishra, Sr.P.S. आदेश की प्रनिलऱपप अग्रेपषि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अऩीऱाथी / The Appellant- .
Kaizen IIT Academy, Plot No.29, Sector-4, Bokaro Bokaro Steel City, 827004 2. प्रत्यथी / The Respondent- ITO, Ward-3(3), Bokaro, Jharkhand 3. आयकर आयुक्त(अऩीऱ) / The CIT(A), आयकर आयुक्त / CIT 4. ववभागीय प्रयतयनधध, आयकर अऩीऱीय अधधकरण, रााँची / DR, ITAT, Ranchi 5. गार्ग पाईऱ / Guard file. 6. सत्यावऩत प्रयत //// आदेशािुसार/ BY ORDER, (Senior Private Secretary) आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, रााँची / ITAT, Ranchi
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026