NEELKANTH VIDYA PEETH,RANGA REDDY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTIONS-2, HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the assessee was granted registration u/s 12A and the assessments were pending due to reopening u/s 147, the matter should be remanded to the AO. The exemption u/s 11 and 12 would be applicable to these pending assessments.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction u/s 11 of the IT Act, but it was disallowed as registration u/s 12A was not granted. The assessee later obtained registration u/s 12A effective from 05/01/2016.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is eligible for exemption u/s 11 and 12 for the assessment years when registration u/s 12A was granted retrospectively and assessments were pending.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Benches, ‘B’ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad Benches, ‘B’ Bench, Hyderabad Before Smt. P. Madhavi Devi, Judicial Member AND Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Accountant Member ITA Nos. 285 to 288/Hyd/2019 A.Ys: 2010-11, 2011-12, 2014-15 and 2015-16 Neelkanth Vidya Peeth I.T.O. (Exemptions) - 2 Majeedpur Village Vs Aayakar bhavan, Basheerbagh Hayatnagar Mandal Hyderabad R.R.District 500 095 PAN: AABTN3063B (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri A.V. Raghuram, AR For Revenue : Sh. Satya Prashant Pinisetty, DR
Date of Hearing: 01/08/2019 Date of Pronouncement: 09/08/2019 O R D E R PER P.MADHAVI DEVI, J.M. All these are assessee’s appeals for A.Y. 2010-11 to 2015-16 against the common and consolidated order of the CIT(A)-9, Hyderabad dated 05th Feb., 2019 confirming the disallowance of the claim of deduction u/s 11 of the I.T. Act, 1961 on the ground that the CIT(E) has not granted registration u/s 12A of the I.T. Act to the assessee. 2. At the time of hearing, the Ld.Counsel for the assessee submitted that the CIT(A) has granted registration to the assessee w.e.f. 05/01/2016 vide order dated 11/6/2016. Therefore, he prayed that the assessments may be remitted to the file of the AO for completion of the assessments in accordance with the Certificate of Registration u/s 12A of the I.T. Act. He submitted that all the assessments have been reopened u/s 147 of the I.T. Act, and therefore, the assessments for
ITA Nos. 285 to 288/Hyd/19 AYs:2010-11 to 2015-16 Neelkanth Vidya Peeth, R.R.Dt. relevant AYs are pending before the AO and in view of the Proviso to Sub-Section (2) of Section 12A, the exemption u/s 11 and 12 of the I.T.Act is applicable to such pending assessments as well. 3. Having regard to the rival contentions and also the fact that the assessee had been granted registration u/s 12A of the Act w.e.f. 05/01/2016 and that the assessments for A.Y.2010-11 to 2015-16 are pending before the Assessing Officer on account of reopening u/s 147 of the I.T. Act, we deem it fit and proper to remand the assessments to the file of the AO for reconsideration in the light of the registration granted u/s 12A of the I.T. Act and also in view of the Proviso to Sub- Section(2) of Sec.12A of the I.T. Act. Accordingly, all the four appeals are treated as ‘allowed for statistical purposes.’ 4. In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are treated as ‘allowed for statistical purposes’. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 09th August, 2019. Sd/- Sd/- (S.Rifaur Rahman) (P. Madhavi Devi) Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated: 09th August, 2019. *Gmv
ITA Nos. 285 to 288/Hyd/19 AYs:2010-11 to 2015-16 Neelkanth Vidya Peeth, R.R.Dt.
Copy to: 1. Neelkanth Vidya Peeth, Majeedpur Village, Hayatnagar Mandal, Hyderabad 500 095. 2. ITO (Exemptions), Ward 2, Hyderabad. 3. CIT(E), Hyderabad. 4. DR, ITAT, Hyderabad. 5. Guard File.
// Copy //
ITA Nos. 285 to 288/Hyd/19 AYs:2010-11 to 2015-16 Neelkanth Vidya Peeth, R.R.Dt.
Draft dictated on 01/08/19 2. Draft placed before the author 01/08/19 3. Draft placed before the second Member 4. Draft approved by second Member 5. Approved Draft comes to SrPS 6. Kept for Pronouncement 09.08.2019 7. File sent to Bench Clerk
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026