AMIT SANAP,KALYAN vs. DCIT CC 1, THANE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities' decisions, finding no infirmity in the rejection of the assessee's contentions regarding the validity of proceedings and the additions made. The assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to counter the additions.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeals for assessment years 2003-04, 2004-05, and 2007-08 were dismissed ex-parte due to the assessee's non-appearance. The appeals challenged the validity of proceedings under Section 153A/153C and additions made by the Assessing Officer.
What were the issues?
The key issues were the validity of assessment proceedings initiated under Section 153A/153C and the justification for additions made to the assessee's income, particularly concerning agricultural income and unexplained cash credits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- K.P. Varghese v. ITO989 citing131 ITR 597 · 1981 · SC
- Guj.), Abhay Kumar Shroff vs CIT (2007) 290 ITR 114 (Jhar.), Spacewood Furnishers Pvt Ltd. v. DGIT23 citing346 ITR 130 · 2012 · HC
- 147 TTJ 6133 citing147 TTJ 613 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN & SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL
PER SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, J.M.
The present appeals have been filed by the assessee challenging the impugned orders of even date 30/11/2019, passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act") by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [“learned CIT(A)”], for the assessment year 2003– 04, 2004–05 and 2007-08. Amit Sanap ITA No. 380 & 681/Mum./2020
When these appeals were called for hearing, neither anyone appeared on behalf of the assessee nor was any application seeking adjournment filed. Upon perusal of the record, we noticed that these appeals were listed for he
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026