AADESH COMMODITIES PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. LD ASSESSING OFFICER, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSSMENT CENTRE, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) passed the order without issuing notice to the assessee and on a misconception. The Departmental Representative conceded that the matter should be remanded.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was dismissed ex-parte by the CIT(A) based on a mistaken belief that the matter was settled under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. The assessee argued that the settlement pertained to a different assessment and the present appeal was regarding a re-opened assessment.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without notice and on a mistaken assumption of settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI A BENCH, MUMBAI
order : July 15, 2022 ORAL ORDER (Dictated in the open court) Per Pramod Kumar, VP:
1. 1. By way of this appeal the assessee-appellant has challenged the correctness of the ex- parteorder dated 11.05.2022, passed by the CIT(A) summarily on the presumption that the matter has been settledunder the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2020.
2. The short point made by the assessee in this appeal is that the order was passed without the issuance of any notice to the assessee and on the misconception that the matter has been settled under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2020. It is pointed out that what was settled under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, was the dispute with respect to the original assessment dated 29.12.2016, but the present appellate proceedings are in respect of the re-opened assessment framed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 147 on 30.09.2021. As a plain look at the appeal folder shows, the relief sought by the assessee, in the above backdrop, is that the matter is remitted to the file of the learned CIT(A) for adjudication on merits.
3. Today, an early hearing petition filed by the assessee seeking an out-of-turn hearing on the above appeal came up for consideration before us. During the course of the hearing on this early hearing petition when the above position, which could be easily culled out from the Assessment year: 2014-15 Page 2 of 2 material before us, was put to the learned Departmental Representative, and it was pointed out that the appeal has been disposed of even without the issuance of notice to the assessee- appellant, learned Departmental Representative fairly accepted that the matter does indeed deserve to go back to the learned CIT(A).
4. In view of the above position, and with the consent of the learned Departmental Representative, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the appeal itself today. The assessee appellant had no opportunity whatsoever of any hearing before the first appellate authority, and to even clarify whether or not the present appeal is covered by the VsVs settlement. In the light of the uncontroverted factual position,as set out in the appeal papers and it is an early hearing petition, we deem it fit and proper to remit the matter to the file of the CIT(A) fortaking a call on the objection raised by the assessee with respect to the present appeal not being covered by the VsVssettlement, and, if thereafter necessary, for adjudication de novo on merits, after giving a fair and reasonable opportunity to the assessee, in accordance with the law and by way of the speaking order. Ordered, accordingly.
In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes in the terms indicated above. Pronouncement and dictation in the open court today on the 15th July, 2022.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026