DCIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S TARGET CORPORATION INDIA PVT. LTD., BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw its appeal. The revenue's appeal was dismissed as the issue was covered by a Supreme Court decision in favor of the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee sought to withdraw its appeal after a Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) resolution under the India-US DTAA. The revenue's appeal concerned a deduction granted to the assessee under Section 10A.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeal could be withdrawn due to a MAP resolution. Whether the deduction under Section 10A was correctly granted.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- III v. HCL Technologies Ltd.245 citing93 Taxmann.com 33 · 2018 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI. CHANDRA POOJARI & SMT. BEENA PILLAI
ORDER
PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present cross appeals are filed by revenue as well as assessee against the assessment order dated 27.01.2016 by the Ld.DCIT, Circle-7(1)(1), Bangalore u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(3) of the Act for Assessment Year 2011-12.
At the outset the Ld.AR at the time of hearing filed a letter dated 10/02/2022, wherein it is submitted that assessee filed application under Article 27 of India US-DTAA, for initiation of MAP Page 2 of 3 IT(TP)A Nos. 680 & 562/Bang/2016 proceedings. It is submitted that MAP resolution has been passed in that respect on 13/12/2021, pursuant to which assessee has expressed it intention to accept the terms mutually agreed between the Competent Authorities. In that respect assessee wishes to withdraw the appeal filed by it before this Tribunal pertaining to entire transfer pricing adjustment proposed for year under consideration. Assessee thus in the letter dated 10/02/2022, seeks to withdraw its appeal in ITA no. 680/Bang/2016. Considering the above request, the appeal filed by assessee is allowed to be withdrawn. Revenue’s Appeal: 3. The only issue raised by revenue in their appeal is regarding the deduction granted to assessee u/s. 10A of the eligible unit. It is submitted by both sides that this issue now stands covered in favour of assessee by the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of CITvs.HCL Technologies Ltd. reported in (2018) 93 taxmann.com 33. Accordingly this ground raised by revenue stands dismissed. In the result the result appeal filed by assessee stands dismissed as withdrawn and appeal filed by revenue stands dismissed. Order pronounced in open court on 07th March, 2022.
More judgments on Section 10A
- Ahaguru Education Technology Private… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1993/CHNY/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- M/S. Aradhyaa Infra & Holdings Pvt. Ltd… vs ITO, Corp. Ward-1(1), ChennaiITA 1793/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Tech Mahindra Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cir 2(3), MumbaiITA 7487/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: Disposed24 Aug 2026AY 2008-09
- D.C.I.T. Circle 3(3), Mumbai vs Rbs Business Services P. Ltd., MumbaiITA 4467/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2007-08
- Rbs Business Services P.Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cir 3(3), MumbaiITA 4306/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026