HEMALI P. PORWAL,MUMBAI vs. ITO 23(2)(2), MUMBAI

This appeal in A.Y.2010-11 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-48, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-48/IT-164/ITO 23(2)(2)/2018-19 dated 12/02/2019 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 19/12/2017 by the ld. Income Tax Officer- 23(2)(2), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO).

We find that the ld. AR filed a letter dated 27/06/2022 mentioning that assessee had preferred an application under direct tax “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” to settle this tax dispute for the year under consideration and had obtained Form-5 from the designated authority thereon, copy of which was enclosed alongwith this letter. Ld. DR also agreed that the Form -5 has been received.

In view of this, we hereby dismiss the appeal pending before us.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.