NGA HR (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT (JAO - DCIT, CIRCLE 7(1)(1), MUMBAI), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the determination of nil price for intra-group services would result in a reduction of the assessee's income and erode the Indian tax base. Therefore, the transfer pricing provisions could not be invoked in this situation as per Section 92(3) of the Income Tax Act.
What were the facts?
The assessee company paid management fees to its Associated Enterprise (AE). The Assessing Officer (AO) and Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) determined a nil price for these fees, disregarding the assessee's transfer pricing documentation. The assessee argued that this adjustment would erode the Indian tax base.
What were the issues?
Whether the transfer pricing adjustment for management fees, which results in erosion of the Indian tax base, is permissible under Section 92(3) of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 92(3),Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 144B,Section 153(1),Section 153(4),Section 92C,Section 92(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Mercer Consulting India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT3 citing72 Taxmann.com 323 · 2016 · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “J” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SMT. BEENA PILLAI & SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Per: Smt. Beena Pillai, J.M.:
S.A. No.122/Mum/2024 A.Y. 2021-22 2
Present appeal arises out of the final assessment order dated 30/09/2024 passed by assessment unit for assessment year 2021-22 on following grounds of appeal:
“Appeal under section 253(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"). against the order dated September 30, 2024 (received on September 30,
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 92(3)
- Fractal Analytics Limited, Mumbai… vs Circle 1(3)(1), Deputy Commissioner of…ITA 764/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax-5(2)(1)… vs Jsw Jaigarh Port Limited, MumbaiITA 5144/MUM/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed17 Jun 2026AY 2016-17
- Hazira Port Private Limited, Ahmedabad vs Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 265/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: Disposed26 Sept 2025AY 2017-18
- Ledvance Private Limted, Gurgaon vs DCIT, Circle-2(1), DelhiITA 540/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: Disposed25 Jul 2025AY 2017-18
- Precision Camshafts Ltd., Solapur vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1962/PUN/2024[2020-21]Status: Disposed10 Jul 2025AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026