ITO, WARD- 3(3), NEW DELHI vs. ASTADIA IT PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the CBDT had revised the monetary limit for filing appeals to Rs. 50 Lacs and that this applied to pending appeals. Therefore, the appeal was not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A) for AY 2011-12. The Departmental Representative pointed out that the appeal was to be withdrawn due to a low tax effect.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of the appeal before the ITAT in light of the revised monetary limits prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘I-1’: NEW DELHI
PER SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JM: This appeal is preferred by the Revenue against order dated 01.09.2017 passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-44, New Delhi {CIT(A)} for Assessment Year 2011-12.
2.0 However, Ld. Sr. Departmental Representative (DR) pointed out that the present appeal is to be withdrawn as the tax effect involved in the case is below Rs.50 Lacs.
3.0 The CBDT vide Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 has revised the monetary limit for filing the appeals before the Tribunal to Rs.50 Lacs. Further, CBDT vide letter dated 20.08.2019 has also clarified that Circular No.17/2019 would be applicable to all pending appeals. In such circumstances, the present appeal filed by the Revenue in case of low tax effect is not maintainable.
4.0 Before parting, we clarify here that the Revenue shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution of appeal, if the requisite material is brought to show that the appeal is protected by the exceptions prescribed in para-10 of the Circular dated 11.07.2018.
5.0 In conclusion, by applying the CBDT Circular dated 08.08.2019 and letter dated 20.08.2019 (supra), the captioned appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as withdrawn/not pressed.
6.0 In the final result, the appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed.
Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026
- Mrs. Aqsa Begum vs. Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026