KUBER FOODS,KARNAL vs. ITO, WARD-2, KARNAL

PDF · subscribers
ITA 891/DEL/2020Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 June 2021AY 2014-152 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal for the assessment year 2014-15. The assessee subsequently requested to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 5(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “SMC-1” BENCH: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT

Hearing: 24.06.2021Pronounced: 24.06.2021

ORDER PER KUL BHARAT, JM :

This appeal filed by the assessee for the assessment year 2014-15 is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A), Karnal dated 19.12.2019.

2.

Ld. Counsel for the assessee, vide its letter dated 17.06.2021, received through email, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.

3.

In view of the above, I accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.

4.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Above decision was pronounced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 24th June, 2021.

More judgments on Section 5(1)

All 1,811 judgments and leading authorities on Section 5(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →