PAYAL ENTERPRISES P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CIR 1, MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3702/MUM/2017Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 July 2022AY 2010-117 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal, following its own previous decision on a similar issue, directed the AO to restrict the addition to the extent of bringing the gross profit rate on disputed purchases to the same rate as other genuine purchases. The grounds related to the validity of reassessment proceedings were dismissed.

What were the facts?

The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment based on information from the Sales Tax Department alleging accommodation entries for purchases. The AO added the entire purchase amount as unaccounted purchases. The assessee provided supporting documents for purchases and sales, but the CIT(A) upheld the addition.

What were the issues?

Whether the reassessment proceedings were validly initiated and whether purchases can be disallowed without disturbing corresponding sales.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 148,Section 143(2),Section 144,Section 151

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH

Hearing: 18.05.2022Pronounced: 28.07.2022

आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथी / The Appellant 2. प्रत्यथी / The Respondent. 3. संबंधधत आयकर आयुक्त / The CIT(A) 4. आयकर आयुक्त(अपील) / Concerned CIT धिभागीय प्रधतधनधध, आयकर अपीलीय अधधकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. 6. गार्ड फाईल / Guard file.

आदेशानुसार/BY ORDER, सत्याधपत प्रधत //True Copy//

(Asst. Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →