PRITI NANDA,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE-54(1), NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as the dispute was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2015-2016. The assessee later requested to withdraw the appeal. This was because the assessee had opted to settle the tax dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn if the assessee opts for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “C” : DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES “C” : DELHI [THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING] BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI MS. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA.No.178/Del./2021 Assessment Year 2015-2016 Mrs. Priti Nanda, The ACIT, A-147, Defence Colony, Circle – 54 (1), vs., New Delhi – 110 024. New Delhi. PAN ABIPN0362K (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : -None- For Revenue : Ms. Anima Baranwal, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing : 29.06.2021 Date of Pronouncement : 29.06.2021 ORDER PER G.S PANNU, V.P.
This appeal by the Assessee for the A.Y. 2015- 2016 is directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-35, New Delhi, Dated 25.09.2019.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of Virtual Hearing before us. The assessee, vide letter
2 ITA.No.178/Del./2021 dated 18.06.2021 has requested through email for withdrawal of the appeal filed by her and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A Certificate to this effect under section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.
Learned Senior D.R. has no objection.
In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Above decision was pronounced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 29.06.2021.
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026