PARAMHANS IMPEX PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 19(3), NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. This was based on the assessee opting to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT for AY 2009-2010. The assessee subsequently requested withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “C” : DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES “C” : DELHI [THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING] BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI MS. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA.No.6952/Del./2019 Assessment Year 2009-2010 M/s. Paramhans Impex The Income Tax (P) Ltd., 98, Pratap Officer, Ward-19(3), vs., Nagar, Hari Nagar, Jail Road, New Delhi–110 064. New Delhi. PAN AAECP4510H (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Rakesh Jain, Advocate. For Revenue : Ms. Anima Baranwal, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing : 29.06.2021 Date of Pronouncement : 29.06.2021 ORDER PER G.S PANNU, V.P.
The above appeal by the Assessee for the A.Y. 2009-2010 is directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-7, New Delhi, Dated 11.08.2017.
2 ITA.No.6952/Del./2019
Learned Counsel for the Assessee appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of Virtual Hearing before us. The assessee, vide letter dated 19.06.2021, received through email has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by it and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A Certificate to this effect under section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.
Learned Senior D.R. has no objection. 4. In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee. 5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Above decision was pronounced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 29.06.2021.
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026