SITA RAM YADAV,GURGAON vs. ITO WARD - 4(2), GURGAON
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee requested withdrawal of the appeal as they opted to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. The tribunal accepted this request.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for AY 2015-2016. The assessee subsequently requested withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn due to settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “C” : DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES “C” : DELHI [THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING] BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI MS. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA.No.3720/Del./2019 Assessment Year 2015-2016 Mr. Sita Ram Yadav, The Income Tax H.No.1225, Sector-IV, vs., Officer, Ward – 4 (2), Urban Estate, Gurgaon PIN – 122 001. Gurgaon – 122 001. PAN AAXPY5206H (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Umed Singh, C.A. For Revenue : Ms. Anima Baranwal, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing : 29.06.2021 Date of Pronouncement : 29.06.2021 ORDER PER G.S PANNU, V.P.
This appeal by the Assessee for the A.Y. 2015- 2016 is directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-1, Gurgaon, Dated 14.03.2019.
Learned Counsel for the Assessee appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of Virtual Hearing before
2 ITA.No.3720/Del./2019 us. The assessee, vide letter dated 13.06.2021 has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A Certificate to this effect under section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.
Learned Senior D.R. has no objection.
In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Above decision was pronounced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 29.06.2021.
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026