ATOS SERVICES (M) SDN., BHD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (INTL TAX) RG-1(1) (2) , MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's application for withdrawal of the appeal, dismissing the appeal as withdrawn. Liberty was granted to revive the appeal if the assessee does not succeed under the 'Vivad-se-Sishwas, 2024 Scheme'.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal challenging an order passed under Section 143(3) r.w.s 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee later filed an application seeking withdrawal of the appeal as they had opted to settle the disputes under the 'Vivad-se-Sishwas, 2024 Scheme'.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn upon opting for settlement under the Vivad-se-Sishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “I” BENCH MUMBAI
Before: MS PADMAVATHY S & SHRI RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN
Date of Hearing 03.02.2025 Date of Pronouncement 03.02.2025 आदेश / ORDER
PER RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN, JM:
The present appeal has been filed by the assessee challenging the impugned order 27.01.2022 passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’), by the Commissioner of Income Tax (DRP-1), Mumbai-2, for the assessment year 2018-19.
An application for seeking withdrawal of present appeal moved by the assessee mentioning that the assessee has opted to settle the disputes under the ‘Vivad-se- Sishwas, 2024 Scheme / DTVSV Act’ and has filed the declaration in Form No. 1. Considering the contents of the present application the same stands allowed and the appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive the appeal if appellant does not succeed under the ‘Vivad-se-Sishwas, 2024 Scheme’.
In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 03.02.2025.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026