PAWAN IMPEX PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 19(2), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issue to the CIT(A) with a direction to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to present its case. The assessee was directed to appear without seeking adjournments.
What were the facts?
The assessee company, engaged in property rental and maintenance services, filed its return of income. The Assessing Officer made additions by disallowing a significant portion of claimed expenditure. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal ex parte due to non-appearance.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal ex parte without granting sufficient opportunity to the assessee, and if the case should be remanded for a fresh hearing.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH : F : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA & SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY
BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2013-14 Pawan Impex Pvt. Ltd., Vs DCIT, D-3, District Centre, Circle-19(2), Saket, New Delhi. New Delhi. PAN: AACCP5321J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Farhat Khan, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 07.07.2021 Date of Pronouncement : 07.07.2021 ORDER
PER R.K. PANDA, AM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the ex parte order dated 20th September, 2017 of the CIT(A)-38, New Delhi, relating assessment year 2013- 14.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of hearing. No application for adjournment also has been filed. Therefore, this appeal is being decided on the basis of the material available on record and after hearing the ld. DR.
Although a number of grounds have been raised by the assessee, these all relate to the ex parte order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the various additions made by the AO.
Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is a private limited company engaged in the business of renting of immovable property and rendering of amenities & maintenance services. It filed its return of income on 28th September, 2013 declaring total income at Rs.1,78,79,890/-. The AO completed the assessment u/s 143(3) of the Act determining the total income of the assessee at Rs.2,47,02,546/- wherein he disallowed an amount of Rs.68,22,656/- out of the expenditure claimed of Rs.93,22,656/-. In appeal, the ld.CIT(A) in the ex parte order passed by her, dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee.
Aggrieved with such order of the CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.
We have heard the ld. DR and perused the record. It is an admitted fact that the first notice was issued by the CIT(A) on 14th August, 2017 fixing the hearing on 17th August, 2017 on which date, the ld. Counsel for the assessee appeared before the CIT(A) with an adjournment petition and the case was adjourned to 20th September, 2017 at 11.10 AM. However, due to non-appearance on the said date, 2 the ld.CIT(A) in the ex parte order passed by her, dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee and confirmed the addition made by the AO. Considering the totality of the facts of the case and in the interest of justice, we deem it proper to restore the issue to the file of the CIT(A) with a direction to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to substantiate its case and decide the issue as per fact and law. The assessee is also hereby directed to appear before the CIT(A) without seeking any adjournment under any pretext and substantiate its case, failing which the ld.CIT(A) is at liberty to pass appropriate order as per law. We hold and direct accordingly. The grounds raised by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Pronounced in the open court at the time of hearing itself, i.e., on 07.07.2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026