SURAJ DUREJA,PANIPAT vs. ITO WARD - 4, PANIPAT

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1102/DEL/2020Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 July 2021AY 2011-122 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the VSV Scheme, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.

What were the facts?

The assessee had filed an appeal before the ITAT. The assessee subsequently opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas (VSV) Scheme and filed the necessary declarations and undertakings.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI

For Respondent: Shri R. K. Gupta, Sr. D.R
Hearing: 06.07.2021Pronounced: 06.07.2021

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘SMC-1’, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) (Assessment Year : 2011-12) Suraj Dureja Vs. ITO 1317, Sec-12, Panipat Ward-4, State- Haryana-132 103 Panipat PAN : ACCPD 3212 D (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Assessee by --None-- Revenue by Shri R. K. Gupta, Sr. D.R. Date of hearing: 06.07.2021 Date of Pronouncement: 06.07.2021 ORDER PER ANIL CHATURVEDI, AM:

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 19.12.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- Karnal relating to Assessment Year 2011-12.

2.

Before us, assessee has moved an application wherein the assessee has stated that it has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas (VSV) 2020 and has filed the declaration (Form-1) and undertaking (Form-2) Scheme and department had issued Form-3. The 2 assessee, therefore, seeks to withdraw the appeal to which Revenue has no objection.

3.

After considering the request made by the assessee, I dismiss the appeal of assessee as withdrawn subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the aforesaid Act, the assessee shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application appropriately as per law. With these directions, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

4.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →