DCIT, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), INTL. TAXATION, NEW DELHI vs. ALSTOM GRID SAS, CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme. Consequently, the appeal filed by the revenue was rendered infructuous.
What were the facts?
The revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A) order. The assessee subsequently filed an application under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, and submitted the necessary forms.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the revenue is maintainable when the assessee has opted for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘D’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. Amit ShuklaDr. B. R. R. Kumar
Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member:
The present appeal has been filed by the revenue against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-42, New Delhi dated 30.10.2017.
At the outset, it was brought to the notice of bench by the ld. AR that the assessee has filed application under the “Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act 2020” and has already submitted Form 1 & 2 and Form 3 has been issued by the designated authority.
Keeping in view the exercise of option by the assessee to opt for the scheme, the appeal of the revenue is being dismissed as infructuous. 2 German Homeopathic Distributors Pvt. Ltd.
In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 06/07/2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026