ADDL.CIT, SPECIAL RANGE-2, NEW DELHI vs. CLETA REAL ESTATE P. LTD., NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal rectified a typographical mistake in its previous order. The corrected operative part of the order states that the revenue's appeal is dismissed and the assessee's appeal is allowed.
What were the facts?
This is a corrigendum to a previous ITAT order dated 8.7.2021. The original order dealt with appeals for assessment year 2014-15. The corrigendum clarifies a typographical error in the concluding paragraph of the original order.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was to correct a factual error in the pronouncement of the tribunal's decision regarding the dismissal of the revenue's appeal and the allowance of the assessee's appeal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
By this corrigendum we rectify a typographical mistake in our order dated 8.7.2021 in wherein in para 13 instead of “ In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed ; the appeal of the assessee is allowed” it is typed “In the result the appeal of the revenue as well as assessee is allowed “ . We rectify this mistake as under :-
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
