BAI NAVJBAI TATA ZOROSTRIAN GIRLS SCHOOL,MUMBAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal has corrected a typographical error in its previous order. The date '24th September 1991' has been substituted with '24th September 2021'. This corrigendum forms part of the original order.
What were the facts?
This is a corrigendum to a previous order passed by the ITAT Mumbai. The assessee is Bai Navajbai Tata Zoroastrian Girls School. The corrigendum rectifies a typographical error in the date mentioned in paragraph 10 of the original order.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the correction of a factual error in a previously passed order. The tribunal addressed a typographical mistake regarding a date.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI “B” BENCH, MUMBAI
CORRIGENDUM Per Pramod Kumar, VP: In the order dated 29th July 2022, passed in this case, an inadvertent typographical 1. error has crept in the same is rectified as follows: In the last sentence of paragraph 10, at page 7, “24th September 1991” shall stand substituted by “24th September 2021”. This corrigendum is attached to, and forms part of, the order dated 29th September 2. 2022 (supra).
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026