TUNISHA DIGANT KAPADIA,MUMBAI vs. THE DY. COMM OF INCOME TAX CPC, BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) has a statutory obligation to dispose of an appeal on merits, even if the assessee does not appear. The dismissal of the appeal without dealing with the merits was found to be contrary to the scheme of Section 250 of the Income Tax Act.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed ex-parte for want of prosecution without adjudication on merits. The assessee challenged this order before the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be summarily dismissed by the CIT(A) for want of prosecution without adjudicating on merits. Whether the CIT(A) must provide a speaking order dealing with the grounds of appeal irrespective of the assessee's appearance.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Marvel Industries Ltd. v. DCIT6 citing140 Taxmann.com 430 · 2022
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI ‘H’ BENCH, MUMBAI
Per Pramod Kumar, VP:
By way of this appeal, the assessee-appellant has challenged the correctness of the ex- parte order dated 23rd May 2022, in the matter of assessment under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2017-18, summarily dismissing the appeal, for want of prosecution, without dealing with the merits.
When this appeal came up for hearing, learned Departmental Representative fairly accepted that the issue is covered by a co-ordinate bench decision of this Tribunal, in the case of Marvel Industries Ltd. Vs DCIT [2022]
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026