ITO, WARD-5(2), NEW DELHI vs. BRIGHT LANDCON P. LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as the assessee had opted for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The dismissal was with liberty to restore the appeal if the dispute was not settled as per the scheme.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A) for AY 2012-13. The assessee subsequently opted to settle the tax arrears under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed due to the assessee opting for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’ : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI O.P. KANT & SHRI KULDIP SINGH
Date of Hearing : 04.08.2021 Date of Order : 04.08.2021 O R D E R PER KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER : Appellant, ITO, Ward 5 (2), New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Revenue’), by filing the present appeal, sought to set aside the impugned order dated 23.02.2017 passed by Ld.
Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-2, New Delhi qua the assessment year 2012-13.
Ld. Counsel for the assessee filed an application stating that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020” and has filed necessary Forms 1 & 2 with the Tax Department, which was accepted and processed vide Form 3 issued by the Tax Department. A copy of Form 3 is also placed on record.
Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, present appeal is hereby dismissed with liberty to get it restored by the assessee in case dispute is not settled as per scheme. The Revenue has no objection with regard to the aforesaid caveat. Consequently, the present appeal is dismissed. Order pronounced in open court on this 4th day of August, 2021 after the conclusion of the virtual hearing.
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026