RAJESH KUMAR,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD- 3(4), GURGAON

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3766/DEL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 August 2021AY 2010-113 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted the assessee's application to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2010-11. The assessee later sought to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘F’, NEW DELHI

Before: SH. N. K. BILLAIYA

For Respondent: Smt. Sushmita Singh, CIT DR
Hearing: 11/08/2021Pronounced: 11/08/2021

PER N. K. BILLAIYA, AM:

1.

This appeal filed by the assessee is preferred against the order of the CIT(A)-1, Gurgaon dated 12.09.2017 for A.Y. 2010- 11.

2.

Vide letter dated 17.06.2021 the assessee sought permission to withdraw the appeal as the dispute has been settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act,2020.

3.

Noting the contents of the application the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

4.

Decision announced in the open court in the presence of both the representatives on 11.08.2021.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →